Hot Issues
spacer
Housing tax measures progress to Parliament
spacer
AirBnb – wrong tax outcome?
spacer
Are young investors wasting their youth?
spacer
ATO sending 'more letters than ever' on income tax errors
spacer
Powerful Budgeting, cash flow and Super Tools available on our site.
spacer
Property, unit trusts in ATO's sights
spacer
Australian Dietary Guidelines and healthy eating chart (PDF)
spacer
Major Bank Levy Passed
spacer
NSW tops list as ATO reveals billions in lost super
spacer
Australia's leading causes of death - ABS
spacer
How is your super going, ready for retirement?
spacer
ATO increasing data exchange with international regulators
spacer
Illegal SMSF early access scheme leads to $6,000 fine
spacer
Our 'hardest' SMSF tasks
spacer
Uber drivers hit for 10% tax
spacer
Lack of literacy promotes unrealistic goals
spacer
Taxpayer failed to prove that payments were “loans”
spacer
New STP dates confirmed as ATO goes on compliance blitz
spacer
ATO flags compliance project for FY17/18
spacer
Items that heat up your depreciation deductions
spacer
Doing a budget is a good idea but ....
spacer
Government ‘undermines’ tax system in new moves on property expenses
spacer
Taxpayer denied deduction for work expenses of $60,000
spacer
Overtime meal expenses disallowed because no allowance received
spacer
Key Economic Indicators, 2017
spacer
Government to shut down salary sacrifice loophole
spacer
Crowdfunding legislation gets greenlight
spacer
ATO heavyweight responds to hacking fears
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Taxpayer failed to prove that payments were “loans”

In a recent case, the Full Federal Court has found that several taxpayer companies had not discharged the onus of proving that assessments the Commissioner of Taxation issued to them were excessive. 

       

 

The amended assessments added income of some $4 million that the Australian companies received from overseas sources, which taxpayers had claimed were loans.

In agreeing with the Commissioner, the Court majority held that it would not be appropriate to find that the taxpayers had provided the required proof that the payments were genuine loans; in fact, they had made inconsistent or “alternative” arguments about the nature of the payments.

This case again demonstrates – good evidence gives the taxpayer a chance (of winning a tax debate).

 

AcctWeb

site By PlannerWeb